tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1862706768442202138.post975839109417140821..comments2023-05-07T05:08:56.655-04:00Comments on A Ram In The Thicket: The Testimony Judge Joseph Laplante Has Not Heard Ryan A. MacDonald (RAM)http://www.blogger.com/profile/04646776550834941203noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1862706768442202138.post-41483901273983643862019-10-24T21:44:26.345-04:002019-10-24T21:44:26.345-04:00I am late seeing Malcolm's comment. He raises...I am late seeing Malcolm's comment. He raises very important questions. The accuser in this case, Tjhomas Grover, stood to gain $200,000 for making these claims. He need not have feared any repercussions for it is very rare that a false accuser is charged with perjury for lying under oath. So yes, he gained much profit and took little risk in the process. Ryan A. MacDonald (RAM)https://www.blogger.com/profile/04646776550834941203noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1862706768442202138.post-34925650107265162762019-08-03T02:35:44.270-04:002019-08-03T02:35:44.270-04:00Perhaps it would be useful for a commentator to me...Perhaps it would be useful for a commentator to mention his background. So a reader may have some idea if the person really knows what he is talking about. Accordingly want to state that I was an auditor for ten years. Which means that it was my job to separate fact from fiction. Had the following basic method for detecting falsehood. The first question...does the accuser stand to benefit through his accusation. If the answer is yes, then the next question is....if the accusation is proven to be false, does the accuser risk a loss. For example, loss of money or reputation, or friends. If the answer is no, he actually risks nothing, then the temptation to falsify or exaggerate is very strong. Malcolm Harris. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10793765734486564933noreply@blogger.com