In Fr Gordon MacRae Case, Whack-a-Mole Justice Holds Court

By Ryan A. MacDonald

I grew up in the sprawling metropolis of New York City. My parents, being somewhat refined folks, took me to all of the city's great cultural institutions, all within walking distance or a subway ride of home. During summer trips to a friend's Lake Winnipesaukee, New Hampshire home, however, all that hard won culture was cast off at a Weir's Beach arcade where I excelled at a game called "Whack-a-Mole." Armed with a heavy padded mallet, there was something cathartic about clobbering those moles popping up in rapid succession. In the summer of 1994, I was hands down the “Whack-a-Mole"champ of Weir's Beach. 

I was completely insulated back then, of course, from something happening in another corner of New Hampshire that year. As I played "Whack-a-Mole," Catholic priest Gordon MacRae, today winding up nineteen years in prison, was fighting for his life and freedom in Cheshire County Superior Court sixty miles away in Keene, NH. Having studied in depth that debacle of a trial and all that preceded it, I know I've lost my "Whack-a-Mole" title to some folks in the "Live Free or Die" state.

As I prepare to publish this article, I have just learned that a pending habeas corpus appeal in the Father MacRae case was denied by Superior Court Judge Larry Smukler without a hearing on its new evidence or merits.  This will bring about further appeals and additional media scrutiny of this case. The latest in a series of articles on the MacRae case by Wall Street Journal investigative writer, Dorothy Rabinowitz, drew international attention to this injustice. At WSJ.com, "The Trials of FatherMacRae" (May 11, 2013) was the most viewed and most emailed article of that week. At last count, it generated over 52,000 links and was cited in whole or in part in hundreds of other venues. 

Among the more than 150 comments posted at the article's on-line version, a few were from New Hampshire resident, Ms. Carolyn Disco, an outspoken critic of the Diocese of Manchester and of Father MacRae (who, by the way she has never met, seen, or spoken with). In posted comments at WSJ and other sites over recent years, Ms. Disco has played a skillful game of "Whack-a-Mole," knocking down any and every exculpatory fact to vie for points in the one-sided propaganda game that fueled MacRae's trial, sent him to prison, and keeps him there today. A few years ago, Carolyn Disco was honored by SNAP, the Survivor's Network of those Abused by Priests, for her outspoken pursuit of New Hampshire's accused priests.

No one else among the Diocese of Manchester's 65+ accused Catholic clergy merits more of Carolyn Disco's vitriolic comments in number, volume, and tone than Gordon MacRae. He also happens to be the only New Hampshire priest who publicly maintains that he was falsely accused. A growing volume of compelling evidence backs up that claim.

I have tracked and documented Ms. Disco's comments from a number of venues over recent years.  The most misleading is a repeated and insulting claim that MacRae himself somehow convinced journalists, legal investigators, and other experts all of whom, in the Disco mythology, supposedly rely only on the imprisoned priest as their sole source for information in this case. When anything new surfaces, MacRae is described by Ms. Disco and a few other SNAP-connected detractors as a skillful manipulator alleged to possess some magical ability to convince many people of his innocence.

Carolyn Disco would have us believe that from a cell in the New Hampshire State Prison, Gordon MacRae, Prisoner No. 67546, somehow mesmerized a Pulitzer-winning member of The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board into taking only his word for it, to consider nothing but his own point of view. Then, in this jaundiced view, MacRae's hypnotic powers from inside prison convinced me and a number of other writers. Supposedly my eight published articles on this case, each containing exhaustive research, overlooked everything but MacRae's own spin.

Then, in the Disco mythology, MacRae went on to similarly convince a career and highly decorated veteran FBI agent who independently investigated this case for three years before concluding in a recent court document that he "discovered no evidence that Gordon MacRae committed the crimes charged or any other crimes." The truth is that when hard questions were finally being asked, not one of this priest's accusers would talk.

Thomas Grover, whose claims sent the priest to a life sentence in prison, reportedly did not present as someone egregiously victimized. Today taking refuge in a Native American reservation in Arizona, he presented as someone caught in a monumental lie. He refused to answer any questions, saying only that he wants a lawyer.

Then MacRae convinced author, David F. Pierre, whose 2012 book, Catholic Priests Falsely Accused has a chapter analyzing MacRae's trial and other accusations and who asserted in his site that "TheMediaReport.com has thoroughly examined Fr. MacRae's case." Then MacRae convinced author and psychologist, James Valladares, Ph.D., whose 2012 book, Hope Springs Eternal in the Priestly Breast was an exhaustive exploration of the injustices visited upon this imprisoned priest by both Church and State.

Then, in Ms. Disco's mythology, this conniving priest conned the entire Board of Directors of the Boston based National Center for Reason and Justice whose team of wrongful conviction experts spent a year looking at the MacRae case before unanimously agreeing to sponsor it for further appeals. Then MacRae convinced the Catholic League for Religious & Civil Rights based in New York to overlook all input but his own before repeatedly coming to the imprisoned priest's defense. Then before any of this began, MacRae convinced a nationally known polygraph expert by passing two pre-trial polygraph examinations. Of interest, my repeated calls for his accusers to undergo similar polygraph tests have been met with silence.

BISHOP-ACCOUNTABILITY LACKS ACCOUNTABILITY

I have written numerous articles outlining my serious doubts about the justice of the case against Father Gordon MacRae and the legitimacy of his imprisonment. I have spent a lot of time ferreting out all the information I can obtain on this case, including that posted at Ms. Disco's favored source, Bishop-Accountability.org.

It was these very documents that finally convinced me of the innocence of this wrongly convicted priest. Anyone who knows anything about personal injury law and the contingency bar will dismiss in hand the many outrageous claims posed in lawsuit writs that comprise much of the material at this prosecutorial site. Claims in lawsuits are designed to achieve one end: to publicly embarrass a third party into agreeing to a lucrative settlement without any discovery process or testimony offered under oath in a court of law. The information in lawsuits is written and published for this singular end by lawyers who contract in advance to take forty percent or more of every settlement. 

In New Hampshire, upwards of $30 million to $40 million has been handed over to these lawyers and their claimants by the Diocese of Manchester. Nationwide, settlements have surpassed $3 billion.The wild claims of these self-serving lawyers are published with no effort at corroboration. These documents comprise the bulk of the "court documents" MacRae's detractors are always referring to in posted comments.

The most disturbing aspect of the MacRae case is the manipulation of facts and information that prevailed behind the scenes. Keene, NH Detective James McLaughlin wrote several reports of his investigation of this case, and all are available at the Bishop-Accountability website that Carolyn Disco is so eager for everyone to see. These reports are confusing because the website has blackened out the names of the "victims," most of whom would themselves be in jail if the entire truth of this case was allowed to emerge.

I just happen to have an unredacted set of Det. James McLaughlin's police reports in the MacRae case. An immediate problem is that Det. McLaughlin had a uniformly followed practice of audio and video recording interviews in virtually every claim of abuse he investigated before and after his work on the MacRae case. In his investigation of another Catholic priest just a year before the MacRae case surfaced, the detective's report began with his meticulously preparing and preserving both audio and video recordings of his interviews with the claimant. In an article McLaughlin wrote at the time, he described such recordings as standard procedure. As a member of the NH Attorney General's Task Force on Child Abuse in the early 1990s, McLaughlin trained other police officers to record every interview.

In the case he choreographed against Father Gordon MacRae, however, Detective McLaughlin did not record a single interview with any of the accusers. This is odd, and it has never been explained. His reports are written in a rambling narrative style that makes it impossible to determine the source of the various claims, many of which seem to come not from the accusers, but from McLaughlin himself. In many instances, the young men McLaughlin interviewed denied that MacRae ever did anything wrong. In editorial comments, McLaughlin then described why he thought the accusers were lying in their denials.

These interviews go on for page after page with McLaughlin badgering these teens to accuse the priest of something. The badgering is interspersed with editorial comments by McLaughlin detailing his uncorroborated suspicions about the priest's sexual orientation. In one documented instance recently uncovered by a career FBI special agent now investigating the MacRae case, a former accuser described being allegedly solicited by McLaughlin to falsely accuse the priest for "a large sum of money," by offering perjured testimony to a Grand Jury, something the young man ultimately declined to do.

But the most egregious injustices in these reports are their omissions. In a report that MacRae attempted to solicit teenager, Jon Plankey in 1988, for example, McLaughlin failed to document that Jon Plankey made the same accusation against a county employee supervising Plankey in a summer job program. Then Plankey accused a Congregational church choir director of solicitation and taking lewd photographs of him. Then Plankey accused another man of solicitation. Then he accused MacRae. Throughout all this, the report indicates, Plankey was working for McLaughlin in "a family-owned business." Today, Jon Plankey refused to answer questions about this case. His brother, however, told a new investigator that the entire Plankey claim was "a fraud for money."

Such serial victimization seemed to be across the board with MacRae's accusers, but none of these facts made it into Detective McLaughlin’s reports. Jonathan Grover accused MacRae, but he also accused Father Stephen Scruton of the identical behaviors he attributed to MacRae. Thomas Grover accused MacRae, but he also accused his adoptive father of sexual abuse, then he, too, accused Father Stephen Scruton. In fact, "he accused so many people he seemed to be going for some sex abuse victim world record" according to the report of a counselor who treated him. David Grover accused MacRae, but before that he accused two other unnamed priests, then he also accused Father Stephen Scruton. These details were not mentioned in McLaughlin's reports.  I have outlined this duplicity along with citations from the respective police reports in "Truth in Justice: Was the Wrong Catholic Priest Sent to Prison?" 

JUSTICE OR PREJUDICE?

One of Carolyn Disco's more revealing comments appeared on June 8, 2013 at 12:31 a.m. at the America magazine website. The comment was posted on an article by Duquesne law professor Nicholas P. Cafardi reviewing the book, Mortal Sins by Michael D'Antonio. The comment under Ms. Disco's name includes the following: "Our attorney general found 'willful blindness, conscious ignorance and flagrant indifference to the danger priests posed to children' on the part of NH bishops."

If Ms. Disco quoted the NH attorney general accurately, then the quote is alarming. Note that it does not appear to distinguish "offender" priests, or even "accused" priests, from "all" priests. Statistically, Catholic priests pose no more risk to children and young people than do Protestant ministers, scout leaders, or public school teachers.  For a public official - especially one sworn to uphold justice - to single out the priesthood itself as some sort of special locus of sexual abuse belies a generalization and prejudice that may render that official unfit for public service. 

Carolyn Disco should provide a source and identity for this quote. It may have been attributed to former NH Attorney General Kelly Ayotte who went on from that position to election as a U.S. Senator. It may also have been attributed to her predecessor, former NH Attorney General Peter Heed.  Prior to holding that office, Peter Heed was a contingency lawyer who gained personal profit from the Catholic abuse scandal in New Hampshire. He brought suit against the Diocese of Manchester on behalf of one of MacRae's accusers, Jon Plankey whose serial victimization claims, described above, have never been explained.

In 2004 - a year after prosecution of the Diocese of Manchester by the NH Attorney General - Peter Heed resigned as Attorney General amid allegations that he "inappropriately touched a woman at a state-sponsored domestic and sexual violence conference" according to the NH Sunday News (January 26, 2013).  He went on to become Cheshire County (NH) prosecutor, a position from which he resigned in December 2012 to sign on with a local personal injury law firm that obtained multiple settlements from the Diocese of Manchester.  In January, 2013, he was arrested for driving while intoxicated and refused a state police blood alcohol test. If Ms. Disco's quote is attributed to former AG Peter Heed, his financial gain from these issues renders such a biased opinion moot.          

In 2003, Senior Assistant Attorney General William Delker prosecuted the Diocese of Manchester using what he himself described as a "novel" theory of law. Following an unprecedented Agreement to publish the files of accused priests as part of his settlement with the Diocese, Mr. Delker described the MacRae case as "one of the worst" in the Diocese of Manchester. It's a statement that Carolyn Disco is fond of quoting in her posted comments.

In 2005, The Wall Street Journal's Dorothy Rabinowitz published a two-part series on the Father MacRae case in which she exposed much of the duplicity and corruption behind this case including the multiple claims of abuse brought against other persons by Father MacRae's accusers. In a local news article after publication of the WSJ series, William Delker was quoted as stating that Rabinowitz "did not present any new information in the case." In other words, he and other prosecutors knew of the fraud and corruption in the background of this case, but it didn't make any difference. Like so many others for whom these high-profile cases became a career booster, William Delker went on to become a New Hampshire Superior Court judge.

These Stone Walls is a Finalist for About.com's "Best Catholic Blog"

These Stone Walls by Father Gordon MacRae is a finalist in About.com's Readers Choice for Best Catholic Blog. In justice, it should win... but there might be hell to pay.

How did such a thing happen?  The Catholicism page of the media site, About.com provides an annual forum for readers to select the very best in Catholic media - everything from best Catholic book, newspaper, and television/radio, to best Catholic blog and other electronic media.  This year, someone in the Catholic online world nominated These Stone Walls, the blog of imprisoned priest, Father Gordon MacRae for the category of Best Catholic Blog in an enormous field of worthy candidates.  These Stone Walls became a Finalist, and at this writing, it has shot up to second place in a short list of five of the best Catholic blogs selected by readers of About.com.  Readers may register a vote, once per day if they wish, at the Best Catholic Blog ballot right here.

Though of course dwarfed by the coming Conclave to elect a successor to Pope Benedict XVI, the story of this honor bestowed upon an imprisoned priest and his writings is an important Catholic news story.  For over a decade, accused Catholic priests have been vilified and bludgeoned without mercy in both the secular and Catholic media. Organizations such as SNAP, the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests, and VOTF, the Voice of the Faithful, have risen up seemingly for the sole purpose of denouncing the Church's disciplines with
in the priesthood and priests themselves when they are accused of claims that usually date back 30, 40, or 50 years.  There is rarely any evidence beyond the word of someone who stands to gain a windfall settlement just for making the claim.  

The result has been a decade of irrational finger-pointing during which the Constitutional and canonical rights of accused priests have been obliterated in the court of public opinion.  These groups, and the mainstream media's unwavering commitment to giving their agendas the last and loudest word in all things Catholic, have teamed to demoralize priests and even turn them upon each other.

Ironically, Father Gordon MacRae provided a spellbinding example in a recent post at TheseStoneWalls.com published on the very day the Best Catholic Blog finalists were announced. In an article entitled "Giving Up Resentment for Lent," the imprisoned priest once again called himself and his readers to take the high road in the face of adversity.  He wrote of the painful recent experience of being denounced by priests of his own diocese.  Displaying the very attributes that make These Stone Walls consistently stand out in the field of Catholic media, the vilified priest wrote of his Lenten challenge to channel anger and head off through prayer his all-too human feelings of resentment and retaliation - "A toxic mix, concocted for another but ending up in your own tea," he wrote.  

Father Gordon MacRae lives behind prison walls, and unjustly so if you have been paying any attention at all to this ongoing saga.  He is the clear underdog in this contest, but his mere presence in it is not without precedent.  In 2010, These Stone Walls was similarly honored by readers of Our Sunday Visitor as the Readers' Choice for the Best of the Catholic Web.  There is a good reason why people are noticing this site and reading it.  

I can only imagine the hell to pay if These Stone Walls actually wins Best Catholic Blog at About.com.  The Church might have to examine anew the sort of justice Catholics really expect when priests are falsely accused. SNAP and VOTF and other detractors might have to consider whether their own toxic voices still carry the day with the message that so convinced so many Catholics and their bishops a decade ago that the only way to protect children was to destroy Catholic priests.

The voting for Best Catholic Blog ends on March 19, just days before the Church enters Holy Week and our common reflection on the Crucifixion of Christ, the Universal Scapegoat.  If there is any justice, These Stone Walls should win About.com's Readers Choice for the Best Catholic Blog.  So go there and vote, and don't forget to take some time this Lent to read this excellent blog. It won't be a penance, but it might just open some eyes and hearts.

Judge Arthur Brennan Sentenced Father Gordon MacRae to Die in Prison

By Ryan A. MacDonald

     Judge Arthur Brennan




Former New Hampshire Judge Arthur Brennan was arrested at a Washington, DC protest in October 2011. In 1994, he sentenced Fr. Gordon MacRae to die in prison.

I spent some time last month poking around inside These Stone Walls, an extraordinary website that by all odds should not exist. I once wrote of all the random factors that had to coalesce for this story of a Catholic priest falsely accused and wrongfully imprisoned to be told. "The Prisoner-Priest Behind These Stone Walls" tells that tale, and hopefully has drawn some fair minded souls to this remarkable site.

Spend just a minute or two at the "About" page at These Stone Walls, and consider its simple math. On September 23, 1994, in Cheshire County Superior Court in Keene, New Hampshire, Judge Arthur Brennan sentenced Catholic priest, Gordon MacRae to consecutive prison terms for a combined sentence of 67 years in prison. The sentence was imposed after a highly problematic jury trial in which MacRae was convicted of having sexually assaulted Thomas Grover  during counseling sessions in 1983 when Grover was 15 years old.

The accused priest was between 25 and 30 years old when his "crimes" - now deemed by many to be fictitious - were claimed to have occurred. MacRae was 41 years old when the sentence was imposed. He is now 59 years old and still in prison. Barring the just outcome of a pending new appeal based on new evidence in the case, the priest will be 108 years old when his sentence is fully served and he is free to leave prison. There is no other possible conclusion. Judge Arthur Brennan sentenced Father Gordon MacRae to die in the New Hampshire State Prison.

From a pragmatic perspective, and even with an emphasis on retributive justice, this makes little sense. Given that New Hampshire prosecutors sought a pre-trial plea deal that would have released MacRae over 15 years ago had he admitted guilt, a 67-year sentence seems an expensive folly that will cost New Hampshire taxpayers millions of dollars. Even if MacRae's sentences were imposed concurrently instead of consecutively - an option for judges when defendants have no prior felony record - MacRae would not still be in prison today.

Parole in New Hampshire for someone convicted of a sexual offense - true or not - invariably requires completion of a prison sex offender program which in turn requires an unqualified admission of guilt. Because of the vast numbers of men convicted of similar offenses in New Hampshire - by some estimates more than 40% of the state's prison population - the waiting list for the prison sex offender program requires that inmates must be within two years of their aggregate minimum sentence to be eligible.

By the time MacRae could fulfill this requirement for parole consideration, over 50 years will have passed between the charged offenses and the "treatment" program. At age 80, this priest's freedom would rest on his ability to reveal with consistency the details of fictitious sexual assaults alleged to have occurred when he was 29. What seemed to make perfect sense to Judge Arthur Brennan in this sentence eludes just about everyone else.

Nonetheless, these considerations are all rendered moot. From everything I have read on this case, MacRae is innocent of the claims, and cannot say otherwise just to avoid dying in prison. Justice is not served when an innocent defendant is coerced to plead guilty to something he did not do just to discharge a decades-long prison term. Coercive plea deals work well for the guilty, but not for the innocent. Careful readers of this story know that MacRae, sitting alone in a county jail awaiting sentencing, his meager assets wiped out by the trial, and his lawyers having abandoned the case for lack of funds to investigate and defend it, was coerced by circumstances into a post-trial plea deal on all remaining charges in exchange for a sentence of zero additional time in prison. He and others close to the case described this, then and now, as "a negotiated lie."

Today, I describe what played out in Judge Arthur Brennan's court after MacRae was found guilty in his first trial as an extorted lie, and it is nothing new. Attorney Barry Scheck, founder of the Innocence Project, reveals that of the hundreds of DNA exonerations his organization has championed to free the wrongfully imprisoned, a full 25% have involved coerced and extorted plea deals such as that inflicted on Father Gordon MacRae, post trial. It is for abuses such as this that a March 21, 2012 U.S. Supreme Court ruling vastly expanded judicial oversight of the pressures placed on defendants during plea deals, requiring that competent counsel advise them.

The details of the related, but untried charges against this priest render them highly doubtful as well. The Wall Street Journal's Dorothy Rabinowitz wrote of these claims brought by three of Thomas Grover's brothers and others in "A Priest's Story: The Trial" (April 27, 2005). I wrote of other details related to these claims in "A Touch of Deja Vu" and "Truth in Justice: Was the Wrong Catholic Priest Sent to Prison?" No just person can read these documents and conclude the legitimacy of Father Gordon MacRae's trial and imprisonment.

A SENTENCE DEVOID OF COMMON SENSE
Gordon MacRae, Prisoner No. 67546, has now been in prison for 18 years. Nearly 30 years have already passed since his charges were claimed to have occurred - charges that new evidence shows were highly doubtful. New Hampshire prosecutors were willing to let MacRae out of prison 16 years ago had he been willing to forgo trial and stand before Judge Brennan to utter a single word, "guilty."

MacRae refused three such prosecution overtures for a plea deal to end the case with a recommended sentence of only one to three years. One such offer was made to the priest's lawyers in writing. Another came in the middle of MacRae's trial. That offer was made just after 27-year-old, 220-pound Thomas Grover wept dramatically from the witness stand as he recounted being forced to endure sexual assaults five times during counseling sessions for his drug problem at age 15 in 1983. He vaguely claimed to return from week to week unable to remember being raped the week before. His heavily coached description of PTSD-induced "out of body experiences" was his only explanation for how such traumatic memories were "repressed." After this incredulous testimony, the two prosecutors looked at each other and headed for a hallway with MacRae's lawyer to offer a new plea deal - this time a sentence of one to two years. The priest refused it.

In the end, Judge Arthur Brennan sentenced Defendant Gordon MacRae to more than thirty times the maximum sentence State prosecutors were prepared to request.  Those prosecutors are long since gone. One was inexplicably fired the day after MacRae's trial ended, and later relocated to another state under a cloud. The other has since committed suicide.

Even a cursory examination of new evidence in the MacRae case warrants vacating his convictions. Additionally, there are elements of the case that could not be part of the appeal process, and are not generally known. For example, MacRae agreed to two pre-trial polygraph examinations in 1994. The polygraph tests were based on the claims of Thomas Grover and his brother, Jonathan Grover, whose accusations amassed most of the indictments for which the priest faced trial. Father MacRae passed the polygraph tests conclusively. Even today, after the passage of 18 years, the polygraph examiner recalls this case and reported that Father MacRae "did very well" on these investigative tools. Neither Thomas Grover nor Jonathan Grover, nor any other accuser ever agreed to submit to polygraph testing.

There is more. A lot more. David F. Pierre, author of the book, Catholic Priests Falsely Accused and host of The Media Report, performed a public service by reviewing hundreds of pages of court documents and trial transcripts now published at the website of The National Center for Reason and Justice. David Pierre's summary of these documents, entitled "Alarming New Evidence May Exonerate Imprisoned Priest," includes the following eye-opening facts:

1.)  The ex-wife of accuser Thomas Grover has revealed this case as a fraud. Her statement describes him as a "compulsive liar" who "never stated one word of abuse by MacRae" until the prospect of money loomed. She describes him as a "manipulator...who can tell a lie and stick to it 'til its end." She reports that Grover's lawyer advised him to "act crazy before the jury" and hired a therapist to heighten the effect. Once Grover got his nearly $200,000 settlement, all therapy came to a halt.

2.)  Thomas Grover's adult stepson today states that Grover repeatedly told him before and after trial that he "had never been molested by MacRae," and that he was "setting MacRae and the Catholic Church up for money." He reports that Grover laughed and joked with him about this scheme before, during, and after MacRae's trial.

3.)  The former wife and stepson both report that before MacRae's trial, Grover repeatedly sought and obtained cash advances on his projected settlement from his contingency lawyer, a practice that is prohibited in the New Hampshire Code of Professional Conduct for lawyers.

4.)  Two observers present throughout the trial report having observed the manipulation of Grover's testimony by therapist Pauline Goupil, M.A., a victim advocate hired by Thomas Grover's contingency lawyer. According to signed statements Ms. Goupil influenced Grover's trial testimony using hand signals for him to feign sobbing during specific segments of his testimony. In several instances she was observed placing her index finger over her eye and down her cheek at which point Grover would commence sobbing, disrupting cross examination and, on at least one occasion, prompting Judge Brennan to call a recess.

5.)  Debra Collett, Thomas Grover's former drug addiction counselor, today states that Grover made so many claims of sexual abuse in the course of drug treatment that "he appeared to be going for some sort of sex abuse victim world record." She reports that his claims of sexual abuse targeted his adoptive father and others, but he did not accuse MacRae.

6.)  Ms. Collett also described that she was threatened by "coercion, intimidation, veiled and more forward threats," "overtly threatened" and confronted "with threats of arrest" by the investigating police detective to alter her testimony for the trial and "to get me to say what they wanted to hear."

7.)  A former accuser of MacRae has today recanted his claim of abuse stating, "I was aware at the time of [the] trial knowing full well that it was all bogus and having heard of the lawsuits and money involved, also the reputations of those who were making accusations." This former accuser attests that "[Keene, NH Detective James] McLaughlin had me believing that all I had to do was make up a story ... and I could receive a large sum of money as others already had. McLaughlin reminded me of the young child and girlfriend I had and referenced that life could be easier for us with a large amount of money." This witness reports he was given cash by Det. McLaughlin after this interview.

8.) James Abbott, a veteran career Special Agent with the F.B.I., today reports: "In the entirety of my three-year investigation of this matter, I discovered no evidence of MacRae having committed the crimes charged, or any other crimes. Indeed, the only thing pointing to any improper behavior by MacRae were Grover's stories - that were undermined by the people who surrounded him at the time he made his accusations."  

Fr. Gordon MacRae taken to prison on September 23, 1994

THE MONEY FLOWS

After Father MacRae was sent to prison, Thomas Grover’s three brothers reportedly walked away from this case with additional settlements from the Diocese of Manchester in excess of $430,000. I have written of these accusations in my column, “Truth in Justice: Was the Wrong Catholic Priest Sent to Prison?” Two of the three brothers also accused another priest, but pre-trial discovery shows no indication that the other priest was interviewed or even investigated.

Following publication of the two-part "A Priest's Story" in The Wall Street Journal in 2005, Arthur Brennan defended his presiding over this trial and his sentence of MacRae by stating that it was all "more complex" than what Dorothy Rabinowitz reported. Indeed it was, and the complexities which continue to surface leave many doubts about the justice of the MacRae trial and the legitimacy of its entire pre-trial investigation and prosecution.

Arthur Brennan took early retirement from the New Hampshire bench for a brief stint with the U.S. State Department's Office of Transparency and Accountability in Iraq. The trial and sentence  of Gordon MacRae have transparency and accountability issues of their own still to be resolved.

Do the Math! Judge Arthur Brennan sentenced Father Gordon MacRae to die in a New Hampshire prison. It's an outcome I suspect this priest would not shrink from if it comes down to it. For the rest of us, evidence now spells out clearly the travesty of justice this case was - and still is.


"We are disgusted with the lack of integrity in Congress, the Senate, The White House and the U.S. Supreme Court. We will stop these pretenders from stealing our freedom and our universal human rights."
By Arthur Brennan, quoted from "Forty years later, a new call to protest" (August 21, 2011).

For more information on this case consult the National Center for Reason and Justice.

Bishop Takes Pawn: Plundering The Rights of a Prisoner- Priest

By Ryan A. MacDonald

Bishop John B. McCormack, Aux. Bishop Francis J. Christian and  Fr. Edward Arsenault, announce names of accused

                                     priests of the Diocese of Manchester.     

                        

     

    "I do believe you will agree that we arrived at a point in our handling of these cases where canon and civil law are being eroded to the detriment and I think diminishment, not only of who we are as human beings, but of who we claim to be as Christians." (Catharine Henningsen, Voice of the Faithful Conference, February 5, 2004).

In October, 2000, Mr. Leo Demers - then Director of Engineering for WGBH-TV, the PBS-Boston television station that produces the news program, "Frontline" -  approached the Diocese of Manchester after being contacted by "Frontline" producers with an interest in the case of wrongly imprisoned priest, Father Gordon MacRae. Mr. Demers first called Auxiliary Bishop Francis Christian who flatly refused to discuss any aspect of the MacRae case. Shortly after, Mr. Demers was then summoned to meet with Bishop John McCormack. According to a sworn affidavit of Mr. Demers, Bishop McCormack informed him in this meeting: 

"What I am about to tell you must never leave this room. I believe Father MacRae is innocent and his accusers likely lied, but there is nothing I can do to change a jury verdict." 

Mr. Demers decided that he could not in conscience honor the secrecy demand of his bishop when two years later he learned that the bishop sent the case of Father MacRae to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in Rome seeking his canonical dismissal from the priesthood based upon no evidence other than the fact of his convictions.

A New Hampshire attorney has corroborated the statement of Leo Demers with a statement of her own. Her sworn affidavit reveals that in December 2000, she sought a meeting with Bishop McCormack after learning of the possible interest of Dorothy Rabinowitz and The Wall Street Journal in looking at the MacRae case. According to her statement, both Bishop John McCormack and Auxiliary Bishop Francis Christian were present at that meeting, and both unequivocally stated their respective belief that Father MacRae is in fact innocent of the claims that sent him to prison. The two bishops informed the attorney of their intent to explore and fund an appeal of Father MacRae's trial and sentence. 

In 2001, Father Edward Arsenault, Bishop McCormack's "delegate for ministerial conduct," raised the following points in two confidential memos to the Bishop: 

"My suggestion is that we address the inequity in Gordon's lack of base remuneration over the last 8 - 10 years {a calculable number) . . . This would alleviate ... the burden from you for extraordinary measures and would be more consistent with Church law." 

"It was unfair of the Diocese not to assist Gordon with funding an appeal of his sentence leaving him with a public defender for his only remaining hope for appeal."

"We ought to admit to Gordon that we have no reason to doubt that the Grovers  [the accusers] may have embellished their testimony to suit their own purposes and that we have never supported Detective Mclaughlin's tactics.” 

The "base remuneration" never took place. However, other confidential memos to Bishop McCormack from other Diocesan personnel reveal their doubts about the trial testimony against Father MacRae, including these excerpts from a memo from Diocesan Attorney Bradford Cook: 

"Throughout this process it was obvious that all of the Grovers were expansive in their testimony and it was aimed at getting a certain result, and frankly none of the attorneys involved in the criminal or civil cases trusted their testimony to be completely accurate. Whether it was all trumped up or totally manufactured is impossible to know . . .  That it was embellished was clear." 

"Detective McLaughlin has been the instigator of many cases in the Keene area and seems to be a crusader on sexual abuse cases, engaging in questionable activities which border on entrapment on occasion." 

"As to the involvement of Father Scruton or anyone else at St. Bernard's, clearly there were several members of the clergy located at that church who had problems and it is impossible to discount that one or more of them may have been involved with one or more of the Grovers." 

THE BOSTON SCANDAL 

In a meeting in early January, 2002, Bishop McCormack promised the imprisoned priest that $40,000 in "non-donated funds" would be set aside to retain appellate counsel for him. Then suddenly the 2002 scandal broke out in Boston, implicated Bishop McCormack, and left Father MacRae outside the rapidly circling diocesan wagons. Bishop McCormack's subsequent memos to the priest continued to promise a defense, but with conditions. The memos called for MacRae's termination of any contact with The Wall Street Journal and Dorothy Rabinowitz before the diocese would agree to assist him further. Bishop McCormack's newer overtures promised help only if Father MacRae would agree to limit any inquiry to the length of his sentence and not the history and merits of the case or the convictions themselves.

Father Edward Arsenault contacted Father MacRae through the prison chaplain in 2002 with an assurance that the Diocese would retain Attorney David Vicinanzo to represent him. Reportedly, Father Arsenault asked the imprisoned priest to forward to his office all defense files retained by the priest. In December, 2002, Father Arsenault answered one of Father MacRae's letters with a statement that he "has not yet had an opportunity to discuss the materials you sent with Attorney Vicinanzo."

Months later, Father MacRae learned that his legal defense files were never given to the lawyer, and were instead taken by the state Attorney General's Office when serving a Grand Jury subpoena for priests' records on the Diocese. From that point on, Father Edward Arsenault and Bishop John McCormack both stopped responding to Father MacRae's letters. 

At the same time all of this was going on, Father Edward Arsenault and the Diocese of Manchester were deeply involved with negotiations with plaintiff lawyers for mediated settlements.  For a stunning review of what went on behind closed doors in these mediated settlements, please see an eye-opening article by Father George David Byers entitled, "The Judas Crisis...Follow the Thirty Pieces of Silver." 

When Bishop McCormack signed an agreement with the Attorney General's Office to publish the files of some 62 priests accused, a part of the agreement was that each priest would have a ten-day period to review and challenge publication of any files pertaining to him. Concerned that privileged legal documents and other materials produced post-trial by Father MacRae were about to be published, the imprisoned priest wrote to Father Edward Arsenault in January, 2003, asking that this ten-day review be afforded to him. He received no reply. 

Ten days after the files were published, in March of 2003, Father MacRae received a letter from an attorney for the diocese describing what he must do to obtain his files and review them before the release. The month-long delay in his receipt of that letter has never been validly explained to him.

After the publication of this vast release of files, Father MacRae wrote to both Bishop McCormack and Attorney General Kelly Ayotte protesting the publication of files that were fraudulently obtained by the diocese and published without regard for the priest's confidentiality rights. Bishop McCormack wrote that he tried to prevent the publication of files that were confidential, but was not successful. Attorney General Ayotte's representative wrote to Father MacRae stating that all files obtained by a Grand Jury in New Hampshire are considered confidential under law, but added that Bishop McCormack signed a waiver of confidentiality enabling all the accused priests' files to be published. 

In 2004, Bishop McCormack proposed in writing that he would like to meet with Father MacRae at the prison to discuss the norms under which he must send Father MacRae's case to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Then the bishop cancelled this meeting and sent the case with no input from Father MacRae, with no defense, and without MacRae knowing any of the specifics of what was sent. 

In 2005, after Dorothy Rabinowitz published a two-part article exposing the clearly unjust trial and imprisonment of Father Gordon MacRae, officials of his Diocese, including his bishop, ceased all communication with him until 2008.

At that time, Bishop McCormack sent a letter to Father MacRae expressing his concern that he has "learned you have retained new counsel" in this case. Bishop McCormack wrote that he has retained counsel to represent him - though no one knows why the Bishop would need representation in Father MacRae's appeal. The Bishop's letter also detailed that he has commissioned lawyers to conduct a review of Father MacRae's trial for the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. The Bishop's secret "review" bypassed all the lawyers and investigators diligently working on Father MacRae's appellate defense. Bishop McCormack has refused to divulge to the priest or his legal and canonical advocates the nature of that secret review.

Father MacRae has had no communication from his bishop since that 2008 letter. In a letter to Rome, Bishop McCormack asserted that since his imprisonment, Father MacRae has refused, through unnamed third parties, to have any contact with his Diocese or other priests.  MacRae has consistently maintained that he has never made such a request and has never learned the identities of these "third parties." It was upon review of the events I have described above that the late Reverend Richard John Neuhaus, Editor of First Things magazine, called the case of Father Gordon MacRae “A Kafkaesque Tale," the title of this editorial in the August/September, 2008, issue of First Things: 

A KAFKAESQUE TALE by Rev. Richard John Neuhaus 

"Among the many sad consequences of the sex abuse crisis are the injustices visited upon priests falsely accused. A particularly egregious case is that of Father Gordon MacRae of the diocese of Manchester, New Hampshire. He was sentenced to thirty-three years and has been imprisoned more than twelve years with no chance of parole because he insists he is innocent. 

I have followed the case for several years. Lawyer friends have closely examined the case and believe he was railroaded. The Wall Street Journal's Pulitzer Prize winning journalist Dorothy Rabinowitz published, on April 27 and 28, 2005, an account of the travesty of justice by which he was convicted. 

Now the friends of Father MacRae have created a website, www.GordonMacRae.net which provides a comprehensive narrative of the case, along with pertinent documentation. Bishop John McCormack, a former aide of Boston's Cardinal Law, and the Diocese of Manchester do not come off as friends of justice or, for that matter, of elementary decency. You may want to visit the website and read this Kafkaesque tale. And then you may want to pray for Father MacRae, and for a Church and a justice system that seem indifferent to justice."

(First Things, August/September 2008)


"For we have made lies our refuge, and in falsehood we have taken shelter." (Isaiah 28:15)

To learn more about the troubling case of Father Gordon MacRae's false accusations and wrongful imprisonment, consult the following: 

http://www.thesestonewalls.com/about/

Exclusive Report: New Evidence May Exonerate Imprisoned Priest
    by David F. Pierre, Jr. 

A Priest's Story Part One: The Trial 

by Dorothy Rabinowitz, The Wall Street Journal 

A Priest's Story Part Two: The Conviction 

by Dorothy Rabinowitz, The Wall Street Journal

A Touch of Deja Vu: The Case Against Rev. Gordon MacRae  

by Ryan A. MacDonald 

Psychotherapists  Send an Innocent Priest to Prison  
   by Ryan A. MacDonald at The Daily Estimate 

Should the Case Against Father Gordon MacRae Be Reviewed?     
   by Ryan A. MacDonald 

Truth in Justice: Was the Wrong Catholic Priest Sent to Prison?  
   by Ryan A. MacDonald 

To Azazel: Father Gordon MacRae and the Gospel of Mercy      
    by Ryan A. MacDonald 

(Ryan A. MacDonald is a Spero News columnist who has written about the crisis in the priesthood for numerous print and on-line venues. He blogs at A Ram in the Thicket). 

http://araminthethicket.blogspot.com/2011/09/touch-of-deja-vu-case-against-father.html